castingvef.blogg.se

Mill harm principle summary
Mill harm principle summary












mill harm principle summary

Because of this great possibility of errors in judgment and an individual's right to autonomy, Mill believes that society should not impose its values on anyone.Ī person should have the right to act as they wish as long as the negative consequences of such actions are only felt by that person. There is no way for the majority to know that they are right and they owe it to the whole of society to listen to all arguments because it is clear that human opinion is fallible. The majority opinion is often faulted because it is biased with self-interest and personal convictions. No matter what they have to contribute, it is extremely helpful to the community.

mill harm principle summary mill harm principle summary

This mute portion of the community may have the wrong, right, or part of the truth in its opinion ­ it doesn't matter according to Mill. This tyranny is even more evil, according to Mill because it is pervasive, penetrating the intricacies of life and social interaction and silencing the minority's voice. However, Mill cites this so-called victory of the people is nothing of the sort, it simply paved the way for a new type of tyranny: the tyranny of prevailing opinion. Whatever the majority opinion was would have to be the decision made by the government so the citizenry would never feel as though their best interests weren't being served. Citizens began to realize that in order to achieve their absolute liberty, government would have to begin working as an instrument, a delegate of the people's will. In the beginning, the retention of liberty was necessary to protect against political tyranny of overzealous rulers.














Mill harm principle summary